AgentSkillsCN

aget-assess-tradeoffs

分析相互竞争的架构考量之间的权衡取舍

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: aget-assess-tradeoffs
description: Analyze trade-offs between competing architectural concerns
archetype: architect
allowed-tools:
  - Read
  - Glob
  - Grep

aget-assess-tradeoffs

Analyze trade-offs between competing concerns and quality attributes. Provides structured decision support for architectural choices.

Instructions

When this skill is invoked:

  1. •

    Identify Competing Concerns

    • •List quality attributes in tension
    • •Document the options being considered
    • •Note constraints and context
  2. •

    Evaluate Options

    • •Rate each option against each quality attribute
    • •Use consistent scale (1-5 or Low/Med/High)
    • •Consider both immediate and long-term effects
  3. •

    Assess Reversibility

    • •Classify decisions: One-way door vs. Two-way door
    • •Note cost of changing later
    • •Identify lock-in risks
  4. •

    Formulate Recommendation

    • •Provide clear recommendation
    • •Explain trade-off resolution rationale
    • •Document rejected alternatives

Output Format

markdown
## Trade-off Analysis: [Decision Topic]

### Context

[What decision needs to be made and why]

### Competing Concerns

| Quality Attribute | Option A | Option B | Option C |
|-------------------|:--------:|:--------:|:--------:|
| Performance | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐ |
| Maintainability | ⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
| Cost | ⭐⭐ | ⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Time to Market | ⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |

### Reversibility Assessment

| Option | Reversibility | Cost to Change | Lock-in Risk |
|--------|---------------|----------------|--------------|
| A | Low | High | Significant |
| B | High | Low | Minimal |
| C | Medium | Medium | Moderate |

### Recommendation

**Choose**: [Option X]

**Rationale**: [Why this trade-off resolution is appropriate given context]

**What We're Trading**: [Quality we're deprioritizing] for [Quality we're prioritizing]

### Rejected Alternatives

| Option | Why Rejected |
|--------|--------------|
| [Option Y] | [Specific reason] |

### Conditions for Revisiting

- Revisit if: [Condition that would change the analysis]

Constraints

  • •C1: NEVER pretend trade-offs don't exist — architectural honesty requires acknowledging costs
  • •C2: NEVER recommend without explaining trade-off resolution — recommendations need justification
  • •C3: NEVER treat all quality attributes as equally important — context determines priority

Related

  • •SKILL-019: aget-assess-tradeoffs specification
  • •ONTOLOGY_architect.yaml: Trade_off, Quality_Attribute, Decision concepts
  • •CAP-ARC-002: Trade-off Assessment capability