AgentSkillsCN

triage-new-issues

审阅新的 GitHub 问题，评估其优先级与紧急程度，为其添加标签并推荐合适的指派人。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: triage-new-issues
description: "Review new GitHub issues, assess priority and urgency, suggest labels, and recommend assignees"
tags:
  - triage
  - issues
  - priority
  - labels
  - backlog

Triage New Issues Skill

Review new or untriaged GitHub issues, assess priority based on urgency signals, suggest labels, and recommend owners.

When to Use

Activate when:

  • •Processing new incoming issues
  • •Reviewing untriaged backlog
  • •Assessing issue priority
  • •Assigning issues to owners

Output Structure (per issue)

markdown
## Triage: #[number] — [title]

### Priority Assessment

**Urgency**: [Critical | High | Medium | Low]
**Impact**: [Wide | Moderate | Limited]
**Recommended Priority**: P[0-3]

| Signal | Indicator |
|--------|-----------|
| [Keyword/label found] | [What it suggests] |

### Classification

**Type**: [Bug | Feature | Question | Task]
**Area**: [Component or area affected]
**Suggested Labels**: `priority/high`, `bug`, `area/auth`
**Suggested Assignee**: @username (owns this area)

### Assessment

[Summary of the issue and reasoning for priority assignment]

### Clarifying Questions (if needed)

- [ ] [Question to understand severity]

### Recommendation

[Immediate action | Next sprint | Backlog | Needs info | Duplicate of #X]

Priority Signals

Critical (P0)

Keywords: "down", "outage", "security", "vulnerability", "production", "urgent", "ASAP", "breach" Labels: critical, security, production Action: Immediate attention required

High (P1)

Keywords: "blocking", "regression", "broken", "can't use", "data loss", "crash" Labels: blocker, regression, priority/high Action: Address this sprint

Medium (P2)

Keywords: "bug", "incorrect", "should", "expected", "wrong" Labels: bug, priority/medium Action: Schedule for upcoming sprint

Low (P3)

Keywords: "nice to have", "minor", "cosmetic", "enhancement", "workaround exists" Labels: enhancement, low-priority Action: Add to backlog

Triage Guidelines

Assessment Process

  1. •Read title and full description
  2. •Scan for urgency keywords and labels
  3. •Check for existing labels that signal priority
  4. •Assess impact (how many users affected)
  5. •Look for workarounds mentioned
  6. •Check if duplicate of existing issue

When to Escalate

  • •Security vulnerabilities → Flag immediately
  • •Production outages → Notify on-call
  • •Data integrity issues → High priority regardless of other signals

When to Ask Questions

  • •Unclear reproduction steps
  • •Missing environment details
  • •Ambiguous severity ("it's broken" but unclear impact)
  • •No indication of urgency or timeline

Red Flags

  • •Issues with no response from author (>7 days)
  • •Duplicate of closed/wontfix issue
  • •Feature request disguised as bug
  • •Missing required information from template