Full Grant Review

Orchestrate a comprehensive review of the T32 grant proposal.

Steps

1. •

   Parse the argument:

   • •$ARGUMENTS = empty or all → run all three stages
   • •$ARGUMENTS = compliance → run only compliance checker
   • •$ARGUMENTS = review → run only study section reviewer
   • •$ARGUMENTS = proofread → run only proofreader on all .tex files
2. •

   Stage 1: Compliance Check Run the t32-compliance-checker agent on the proposal.

   • •This checks section completeness, page limits, required content elements, and formatting
   • •Output: quality_reports/t32_compliance_report.md
3. •

   Stage 2: Study Section Review Run the nih-study-section-reviewer agent on the proposal.

   • •This simulates a T32 study section review with scores and critique
   • •Output: quality_reports/study_section_review.md
4. •

   Stage 3: Proofreading Run the proofreader agent on all .tex files in proposal/.

   • •Check each section file for grammar, typos, consistency, and academic quality
   • •Output: quality_reports/proposal_proofread_report.md
5. •

   Aggregate Results After all stages complete, create a summary report at quality_reports/grant_review_summary.md:

   markdown

   # Grant Review Summary
   
   **Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
   **Stages Run:** [list]
   
   ## Compliance
   - **Status:** PASS / FAIL / PASS WITH WARNINGS
   - **Critical Issues:** [count and summary]
   - **Warnings:** [count]
   
   ## Study Section Review
   - **Overall Impact Score:** [N]/9
   - **Criterion Scores:** [list each]
   - **Top Strengths:** [top 3]
   - **Top Weaknesses:** [top 3]
   
   ## Proofreading
   - **Issues Found:** [count by severity]
   - **High Priority:** [list]
   
   ## Recommended Actions (Priority Order)
   1. [Most critical action]
   2. [Next action]
   3. ...
   

6. •

   Report to user:

   • •Summary of findings across all three stages
   • •Paths to all generated reports
   • •Recommended next steps in priority order