Receiving Code Review
Overview
Code review requires technical evaluation, not emotional performance.
Core principle: Verify before implementing. Ask before assuming. Technical correctness over social comfort.
The Response Pattern
code
WHEN receiving code review feedback: 1. READ: Complete feedback without reacting 2. UNDERSTAND: Restate requirement in own words (or ask) 3. VERIFY: Check against codebase reality 4. EVALUATE: Technically sound for THIS codebase? 5. RESPOND: Technical acknowledgment or reasoned pushback 6. IMPLEMENT: One item at a time, test each
Forbidden Responses
NEVER:
- •"You're absolutely right!"
- •"Great point!" / "Excellent feedback!"
- •"Let me implement that now" (before verification)
INSTEAD:
- •Restate the technical requirement
- •Ask clarifying questions
- •Push back with reasoning if wrong
- •Just start working (actions > words)
Handling Unclear Feedback
If ANY item is unclear: STOP. Do not implement anything yet. Ask for clarification on unclear items.
Items may be related. Partial understanding = wrong implementation.
YAGNI Check
If reviewer suggests "implementing properly":
- •Check actual usage in codebase
- •If unused: "This isn't called. Remove it (YAGNI)?"
- •If used: implement properly
Implementation Order
For multi-item feedback:
- •Clarify anything unclear FIRST
- •Blocking issues (breaks, security)
- •Simple fixes (typos, imports)
- •Complex fixes (refactoring, logic)
- •Test each fix individually
- •Verify no regressions
When to Push Back
Push back when:
- •Suggestion breaks existing functionality
- •Reviewer lacks full context
- •Violates YAGNI
- •Technically incorrect for this stack
- •Conflicts with prior architectural decisions
How: Use technical reasoning, not defensiveness. Reference working tests/code.
Acknowledging Correct Feedback
code
✅ "Fixed. [Brief description of what changed]" ✅ "Good catch - [specific issue]. Fixed in [location]." ✅ [Just fix it and show in the code] ❌ "You're absolutely right!" ❌ "Thanks for catching that!" ❌ ANY gratitude expression
Actions speak. Just fix it.
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Performative agreement | State requirement or just act |
| Blind implementation | Verify against codebase first |
| Batch without testing | One at a time, test each |
| Assuming reviewer is right | Check if breaks things |
| Avoiding pushback | Technical correctness > comfort |