AgentSkillsCN

go-code-review

审查Go代码,关注其惯用模式、错误处理、并发安全,以及常见编程误区。在审查.go文件、检查错误处理、Goroutine使用情况,或接口设计时使用。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: go-code-review
description: Reviews Go code for idiomatic patterns, error handling, concurrency safety, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .go files, checking error handling, goroutine usage, or interface design.

Go Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
Missing error checks, wrapped errorsreferences/error-handling.md
Race conditions, channel misusereferences/concurrency.md
Interface pollution, namingreferences/interfaces.md
Resource leaks, defer misusereferences/common-mistakes.md

Review Checklist

  • All errors are checked (no _ = err)
  • Errors wrapped with context (fmt.Errorf("...: %w", err))
  • Resources closed with defer immediately after creation
  • No goroutine leaks (channels closed, contexts canceled)
  • Interfaces defined by consumers, not producers
  • Interface names end in -er (Reader, Writer, Handler)
  • Exported names have doc comments
  • No naked returns in functions > 5 lines
  • Context passed as first parameter
  • Mutexes protect shared state, not methods

When to Load References

  • Reviewing error return patterns → error-handling.md
  • Reviewing goroutines/channels → concurrency.md
  • Reviewing type definitions → interfaces.md
  • General Go review → common-mistakes.md

Review Questions

  1. Are all error returns checked and wrapped?
  2. Are goroutines properly managed with context cancellation?
  3. Are resources (files, connections) closed with defer?
  4. Are interfaces minimal and defined where used?

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These patterns are acceptable and should NOT be flagged as issues:

  • _ = err with reason comment - Intentionally ignored errors with explanation
    go
    _ = conn.Close() // Best effort cleanup, already handling primary error
    
  • Empty interface interface{} - For truly generic code (pre-generics codebases)
  • Naked returns in short functions - Acceptable in functions < 5 lines with named returns
  • Channel without close - When consumer stops via context cancellation, not channel close
  • Mutex protecting struct fields - Even if accessed only via methods, this is correct encapsulation
  • //nolint directives with reason - Acceptable when accompanied by explanation
    go
    //nolint:errcheck // Error logged but not returned per API contract
    
  • Defer in loop - When function scope cleanup is intentional (e.g., processing files in batches)

Context-Sensitive Rules

Only flag these issues when the specific conditions apply:

IssueFlag ONLY IF
Missing error checkError return is actionable (can retry, log, or propagate)
Goroutine leakNo context cancellation path exists for the goroutine
Missing deferResource isn't explicitly closed before next acquisition or return
Interface pollutionInterface has > 1 method AND only one consumer exists

Before Submitting Findings

Load and follow review-verification-protocol before reporting any issue.